Vis enkel innførsel

dc.date.accessioned2011-03-24T12:54:34Znb_NO
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-08T14:18:12Z
dc.date.available2011-03-24T12:54:34Znb_NO
dc.date.available2016-02-08T14:18:12Z
dc.date.issued2009-12-16nb_NO
dc.identifierhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-S1-S17nb_NO
dc.identifier.citationHealth Research Policy and Systems. 2009 Dec 16;7(Suppl 1):S17nb_NO
dc.identifier.issn1478-4505
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11250/2377419
dc.description.abstractAbstract This article is part of a series written for people responsible for making decisions about health policies and programmes and for those who support these decision makers. In this article, we address the issue of decision making in situations in which there is insufficient evidence at hand. Policymakers often have insufficient evidence to know with certainty what the impacts of a health policy or programme option will be, but they must still make decisions. We suggest four questions that can be considered when there may be insufficient evidence to be confident about the impacts of implementing an option. These are: 1. Is there a systematic review of the impacts of the option? 2. Has inconclusive evidence been misinterpreted as evidence of no effect? 3. Is it possible to be confident about a decision despite a lack of evidence? 4. Is the option potentially harmful, ineffective or not worth the cost?nb_NO
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleSUPPORT Tools for evidence-informed health Policymaking (STP) 17: Dealing with insufficient research evidencenb_NO
dc.typeJournal articlenb_NO
dc.typePeer reviewednb_NO
dc.date.updated2011-03-24T12:54:35Znb_NO
dc.rights.holderet al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.nb_NO


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel