• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Folkehelseinstituttet
  • Publikasjoner fra Kunnskapssenteret 2004 - 2015
  • Artikler fra Kunnskapssenteret
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Folkehelseinstituttet
  • Publikasjoner fra Kunnskapssenteret 2004 - 2015
  • Artikler fra Kunnskapssenteret
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

What do we know about how to do audit and feedback? Pitfalls in applying evidence from a systematic review.

Foy, R; Eccles, M P; Jamtvedt, Gro; Young, J; Grimshaw, J M; Baker, R
Journal article, Peer reviewed
Thumbnail
View/Open
Article (233.2Kb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2377762
Date
2005-07-13
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler fra Kunnskapssenteret [300]
Original version
BMC health services research 2005, 5:50   10.1186/1472-6963-5-50
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improving the quality of health care requires a range of evidence-based activities. Audit and feedback is commonly used as a quality improvement tool in the UK National Health Service [NHS]. We set out to assess whether current guidance and systematic review evidence can sufficiently inform practical decisions about how to use audit and feedback to improve quality of care. METHODS: We selected an important chronic disease encountered in primary care: diabetes mellitus. We identified recommendations from National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance on conducting audit and generated questions which would be relevant to any attempt to operationalise audit and feedback in a healthcare service setting. We explored the extent to which a systematic review of audit and feedback could provide practical guidance about whether audit and feedback should be used to improve quality of diabetes care and, if so, how audit and feedback could be optimised. RESULTS: National guidance suggests the importance of securing the right organisational conditions and processes. Review evidence suggests that audit and feedback can be effective in changing healthcare professional practice. However, the available evidence says relatively little about the detail of how to use audit and feedback most efficiently. CONCLUSION: Audit and feedback will continue to be an unreliable approach to quality improvement until we learn how and when it works best. Conceptualising audit and feedback within a theoretical framework offers a way forward.
Publisher
BioMed Central
Journal
BMC health services research

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit