dc.contributor.author | Rosenbaum, Sarah Ellen | en |
dc.contributor.author | Glenton, Claire | en |
dc.contributor.author | Oxman, Andrew David | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-26T21:01:59Z | nb_NO |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-02-08T14:19:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2010-09-26T21:01:59Z | nb_NO |
dc.date.available | 2016-02-08T14:19:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010-06 | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.citation | Journal of clinical epidemiology 2010, 63 (6):620-6 | en |
dc.identifier.issn | 1878-5921 | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2377958 | |
dc.description.abstract | OBJECTIVE: To measure the effects of a summary-of-findings (SoF) table on user satisfaction, understanding, and time spent finding key results in a Cochrane review. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We randomized participants in an evidence-based practice workshop (randomized controlled trial [RCT] I) and a Cochrane Collaboration entities meeting (RCT II) to receive a Cochrane review with or without an SoF table. In RCT I, we measured user satisfaction. In RCT II, we measured correct comprehension and time spent finding key results. RESULTS: RCT I: Participants with the SoF table (n=47) were more likely to "agree" or "strongly agree" that it was easy to find results for important outcomes than (n=25) participants without the SoF table-68% vs. 40% (P=0.021). RCT II: Participants with the SoF table (n=18) were more likely to correctly answer two questions regarding results than (n=15) those without the SoF table: 93% vs. 44% (P=0.003) and 87% vs. 11% (P<0.001). Participants with the SoF table spent an average of 90 seconds to find key information compared with 4 minutes for participants without the SoF table (P=0.002). CONCLUSION: In two small trials, we found that inclusion of an SoF table in a review improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key findings compared with reviews with no SoF table. | en |
dc.language.iso | eng | en |
dc.relation.uri | http://www.jclinepi.com/article/S0895-4356%2810%2900028-4/abstract | en |
dc.subject | VDP::Medisinske Fag: 700::Helsefag: 800::Helsetjeneste- og helseadministrasjonsforskning: 806 | en |
dc.subject | VDP::Samfunnsvitenskap: 200::Biblioteks- og informasjonsvitenskap: 320::Kunnskapsgjenfinning og organisering: 323 | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Comprehension | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Consumer Satisfaction | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Data Display | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Evidence-Based Medicine | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Humans | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Information Storage and Retrieval | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Research Design | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Review Literature as Topic | en |
dc.subject.mesh | Time Factors | en |
dc.title | Summary-of-findings tables in Cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information. | en |
dc.type | Journal article | en |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Journal of clinical epidemiology | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.12.014 | nb_NO |
dc.identifier.pmid | 20434024 | nb_NO |
dc.contributor.department | Department of Communication, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services, Oslo, Norway. sarah.rosenbaum@kunnskapssenteret.no | en |