• norsk
    • English
  • English 
    • norsk
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   Home
  • Folkehelseinstituttet
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin FHI
  • View Item
  •   Home
  • Folkehelseinstituttet
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin FHI
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

A comparative analysis of in vitro toxicity of diesel exhaust particles from combustion of 1st-and 2nd-generation biodiesel fuels in relation to their physicochemical properties-the FuelHealth project

Lankoff, Anna; Brzoska, Kamil; Czarnocka, Joanna; Kowalska, Magdalena; Lisowska, Halina; Mruk, Remigiusz; Øvrevik, Johan; Wegierek-Ciuk, Aneta; Zuberek, Mariusz; Kruszewski, Marcin
Peer reviewed, Journal article
Published version
Thumbnail
View/Open
Lankoff_2017_Aco.pdf (2.165Mb)
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2494732
Date
2017
Metadata
Show full item record
Collections
  • Artikler [5038]
  • Publikasjoner fra CRIStin FHI [7479]
Original version
Environmental science and pollution research international. 2017, 24 (23), 19357-19374.   10.1007/s11356-017-9561-9
Abstract
Biodiesels represent more carbon-neutral fuels and are introduced at an increasing extent to reduce emission of greenhouse gases. However, the potential impact of different types and blend concentrations of biodiesel on the toxicity of diesel engine emissions are still relatively scarce and to some extent contradictory. The objective of the present work was to compare the toxicity of diesel exhaust particles (DEP) from combustion of two 1st-generation fuels: 7% fatty acid methyl esters (FAME; B7) and 20% FAME (B20) and a 2nd-generation 20% FAME/HVO (synthetic hydrocarbon biofuel (SHB)) fuel. Our findings indicate that particulate emissions of each type of biodiesel fuel induce cytotoxic effects in BEAS-2B and A549 cells, manifested as cell death (apoptosis or necrosis), decreased protein concentrations, intracellular ROS production, as well as increased expression of antioxidant genes and genes coding for DNA damage-response proteins. The different biodiesel blend percentages and biodiesel feedstocks led to marked differences in chemical composition of the emitted DEP. The different DEPs also displayed statistically significant differences in cytotoxicity in A549 and BEAS-2B cells, but the magnitude of these variations was limited. Overall, it seems that increasing biodiesel blend concentrations from the current 7 to 20% FAME, or substituting 1st-generation FAME biodiesel with 2nd-generation HVO biodiesel (at least below 20% blends), affects the in vitro toxicity of the emitted DEP to some extent, but the biological significance of this may be moderate.
Journal
Environmental science and pollution research international

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit
 

 

Browse

ArchiveCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournalsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsDocument TypesJournals

My Account

Login

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

Contact Us | Send Feedback

Privacy policy
DSpace software copyright © 2002-2019  DuraSpace

Service from  Unit