Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorKristoffersen, Doris Tove
dc.contributor.authorHelgeland, Jon
dc.contributor.authorClench-Aas, Jocelyne
dc.contributor.authorLaake, Petter
dc.contributor.authorVeierød, Marit Bragelien
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-25T12:50:36Z
dc.date.available2022-07-25T12:50:36Z
dc.date.created2018-07-03T13:11:44Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3008211
dc.description.abstractIntroduction A common quality indicator for monitoring and comparing hospitals is based on death within 30 days of admission. An important use is to determine whether a hospital has higher or lower mortality than other hospitals. Thus, the ability to identify such outliers correctly is essential. Two approaches for detection are: 1) calculating the ratio of observed to expected number of deaths (OE) per hospital and 2) including all hospitals in a logistic regression (LR) comparing each hospital to a form of average over all hospitals. The aim of this study was to compare OE and LR with respect to correctly identifying 30-day mortality outliers. Modifications of the methods, i.e., variance corrected approach of OE (OE-Faris), bias corrected LR (LR-Firth), and trimmed mean variants of LR and LR-Firth were also studied. Materials and methods To study the properties of OE and LR and their variants, we performed a simulation study by generating patient data from hospitals with known outlier status (low mortality, high mortality, non-outlier). Data from simulated scenarios with varying number of hospitals, hospital volume, and mortality outlier status, were analysed by the different methods and compared by level of significance (ability to falsely claim an outlier) and power (ability to reveal an outlier). Moreover, administrative data for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), stroke, and hip fracture from Norwegian hospitals for 2012–2014 were analysed. Results None of the methods achieved the nominal (test) level of significance for both low and high mortality outliers. For low mortality outliers, the levels of significance were increased four- to fivefold for OE and OE-Faris. For high mortality outliers, OE and OE-Faris, LR 25% trimmed and LR-Firth 10% and 25% trimmed maintained approximately the nominal level. The methods agreed with respect to outlier status for 94.1% of the AMI hospitals, 98.0% of the stroke, and 97.8% of the hip fracture hospitals. Conclusion We recommend, on the balance, LR-Firth 10% or 25% trimmed for detection of both low and high mortality outliers
dc.language.isoeng
dc.subjectKvalitet i helsetjenesten
dc.subjectQuality in health care
dc.subjectDatasimulering
dc.subjectData simulation
dc.subjectMedisinsk statistikk
dc.subjectMedical statistics
dc.titleObserved to expected or logistic regression to identify hospitals with high or low 30-day mortality?
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Statistikk: 412
dc.subject.nsiVDP::Statistics: 412
dc.source.volume13
dc.source.journalPLoS ONE
dc.source.issue4
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0195248
dc.identifier.cristin1595432
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 160340
cristin.unitcode7502,9,0,0
cristin.unitcode7502,3,11,0
cristin.unitnameHelsetjenester
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for psykisk helse og selvmord
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel