Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorAmato, Ettore
dc.contributor.authorRiess, Maximilian
dc.contributor.authorThomas-Lopez, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorLinkevicius, Marius
dc.contributor.authorPitkänen, Tarja
dc.contributor.authorWołkowicz, Tomasz
dc.contributor.authorRjabinina, Jelena
dc.contributor.authorJernberg, Cecilia
dc.contributor.authorHjertqvist, Marika
dc.contributor.authorMacdonald, Emily Ann
dc.contributor.authorAntony Samy, Jeevan Karloss
dc.contributor.authorBjerre, Karsten Dalsgaard
dc.contributor.authorSalmenlinna, Saara
dc.contributor.authorFuursted, Kurt
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Anette
dc.contributor.authorNaseer, Mohammed Umaer
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-03T07:18:18Z
dc.date.available2022-10-03T07:18:18Z
dc.date.created2022-09-30T10:40:01Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1025-496X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3023170
dc.description.abstractBackground Vibriosis cases in Northern European countries and countries bordering the Baltic Sea increased during heatwaves in 2014 and 2018. Aim We describe the epidemiology of vibriosis and the genetic diversity of Vibrio spp. isolates from Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Poland and Estonia in 2018, a year with an exceptionally warm summer. Methods In a retrospective study, we analysed demographics, geographical distribution, seasonality, causative species and severity of non-travel-related vibriosis cases in 2018. Data sources included surveillance systems, national laboratory notification databases and/or nationwide surveys to public health microbiology laboratories. Moreover, we performed whole genome sequencing and multilocus sequence typing of available isolates from 2014 to 2018 to map their genetic diversity. Results In 2018, we identified 445 non-travel-related vibriosis cases in the study countries, considerably more than the median of 126 cases between 2014 and 2017 (range: 87–272). The main reported mode of transmission was exposure to seawater. We observed a species-specific geographical disparity of vibriosis cases across the Nordic-Baltic region. Severe vibriosis was associated with infections caused by Vibrio vulnificus (adjOR: 17.2; 95% CI: 3.3–90.5) or Vibrio parahaemolyticus (adjOR: 2.1; 95% CI: 1.0–4.5), age ≥ 65 years (65–79 years: adjOR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.7–8.7; ≥ 80 years: adjOR: 15.5; 95% CI: 4.4–54.3) or acquiring infections during summer (adjOR: 5.1; 95% CI: 2.4–10.9). Although phylogenetic analysis revealed diversity between Vibrio spp. isolates, two V. vulnificus clusters were identified. Conclusion Shared sentinel surveillance for vibriosis during summer may be valuable to monitor this emerging public health issue.
dc.description.abstractEpidemiological and microbiological investigation of a large increase in vibriosis, northern Europe, 2018
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleEpidemiological and microbiological investigation of a large increase in vibriosis, northern Europe, 2018
dc.title.alternativeEpidemiological and microbiological investigation of a large increase in vibriosis, northern Europe, 2018
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.volume27
dc.source.journalEurosurveillance
dc.source.issue28
dc.identifier.doi10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.28.2101088
dc.identifier.cristin2057081
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel