Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSoleiman Pour Hashemi, Neda
dc.contributor.authorSkogen, Jens Christoffer
dc.contributor.authorSevic, Aleksandra
dc.contributor.authorThørrisen, Mikkel Magnus
dc.contributor.authorRimstad, Silje Lill
dc.contributor.authorSagvaag, Hildegunn
dc.contributor.authorRiper, Heleen
dc.contributor.authorAas, Randi Wågø
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-21T07:46:10Z
dc.date.available2022-10-21T07:46:10Z
dc.date.created2022-01-12T19:11:36Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3027470
dc.description.abstractAIM: Earlier research has revealed a strong relationship between alcohol use and sickness absence. The aim of this review was to explore and uncover this relationship by looking at differences in type of design (cross-sectional vs. longitudinal), type of data (self-reported vs. registered data), and type of sickness absence (long-term vs. short-term). METHOD: Six databases were searched through June 2020. Observational and experimental studies from 1980 to 2020, in English or Scandinavian languages reporting the results of the association between alcohol consumption and sickness absence among working population were included. Quality assessment, and statistical analysis focusing on differences in the likelihood of sickness absence on subgroup levels were performed on each association, not on each study. Differences in the likelihood of sickness absence were analyzed by means of meta-analysis. PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018112078. RESULTS: Fifty-nine studies (58% longitudinal) including 439,209 employees (min. 43, max. 77,746) from 15 countries were included. Most associations indicating positive and statistically significant results were based on longitudinal data (70%) and confirmed the strong/causal relationship between alcohol use and sickness absence. The meta-analysis included eight studies (ten samples). The increased risk for sickness absence was likely to be found in cross-sectional studies (OR:8.28, 95% CI:6.33-10.81), studies using self-reported absence data (OR:5.16, 95% CI:3.16-8.45), and those reporting short-term sickness absence (OR:4.84, 95% CI:2.73-8.60). CONCLUSION: This review supports, but also challenges earlier evidence on the association between alcohol use and sickness absence. Certain types of design, data, and types of sickness absence may produce large effects. Hence, to investigate the actual association between alcohol and sickness absence, research should produce and review longitudinal designed studies using registry data and do subgroup analyses that cover and explain variability of this associations.
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleA systematic review and meta-analysis uncovering the relationship between alcohol consumption and sickness absence. When type of design, data, and sickness absence make a difference
dc.title.alternativeA systematic review and meta-analysis uncovering the relationship between alcohol consumption and sickness absence. When type of design, data, and sickness absence make a difference
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.journalPLOS ONE
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0262458
dc.identifier.cristin1979931
dc.relation.projectUniversitetet i Stavanger: IN-11551
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 260640
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel