Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorCaspersen, Ida Henriette
dc.contributor.authorTrogstad, Lill
dc.contributor.authorGalanti, Maria Rosaria
dc.contributor.authorKarvonen, Sakari
dc.contributor.authorPeña, Sebastián
dc.contributor.authorShaaban, Ahmed Nabil
dc.contributor.authorHåberg, Siri Eldevik
dc.contributor.authorMagnus, Per
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-24T08:57:01Z
dc.date.available2023-05-24T08:57:01Z
dc.date.created2023-05-16T10:39:48Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationBMC Public Health. 2023, 23 1-9.
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3068787
dc.description.abstractBackground Clear evidence of an increased risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection among smokers has not been established. We aimed to investigate associations between cigarette smoking or use of snus (snuff) and other nicotine-containing products and a positive SARS-CoV-2 test, taking test behavior into account. Methods Current tobacco use and testing behavior during the pandemic were recorded by adult participants from the Norwegian Mother, Father and Child Cohort Study and The Norwegian Influenza Pregnancy Cohort. SARS-CoV-2 infection status was obtained from The Norwegian Surveillance System for Communicable Diseases (MSIS) in May 2021 (n = 78,860) and antibody measurements (n = 5581). We used logistic regression models stratified by gender and adjusted for age, education, region, number of household members, and work situation. Results Snus use was more common among men (26%) than women (9%) and more prevalent than cigarette smoking. We found no clear associations between cigarette smoking or snus and a COVID-19 diagnosis among men. Associations among women were conflicting, indicating that cigarette smoke was negatively associated with a diagnosis (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.35, 0.75), while no association was found for snus use (OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.86, 1.34). Compared with non-users of tobacco, both cigarette smokers and snus users had increased odds of being tested for SARS-CoV-2. Conclusions Cigarette smoking, but not snus use, was negatively associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in women. The lack of an association between snus use and SARS-CoV-2 infection in this population with prevalent snus use does not support the hypothesis of a protective effect of nicotine.
dc.description.abstractCurrent tobacco use and SARS-CoV-2 infection in two Norwegian population-based cohorts
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleCurrent tobacco use and SARS-CoV-2 infection in two Norwegian population-based cohorts
dc.title.alternativeCurrent tobacco use and SARS-CoV-2 infection in two Norwegian population-based cohorts
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.pagenumber1-9
dc.source.volume23
dc.source.journalBMC Public Health
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12889-023-15822-5
dc.identifier.cristin2147767
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 262700
dc.relation.projectNordforsk: 105544
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel