Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorComber, Laura
dc.contributor.authorMurchu, Eamon O
dc.contributor.authorJordan, Karen
dc.contributor.authorHawkshaw, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Liam
dc.contributor.authorO'Neill, Michelle
dc.contributor.authorTeljeur, Conor
dc.contributor.authorRyan, Máirín
dc.contributor.authorCarnahan, AnnaSara
dc.contributor.authorPérez Martín, Jaime Jesús
dc.contributor.authorRobertson, Anna Hayman
dc.contributor.authorJohansen, Kari
dc.contributor.authorDe Jonge, Jørgen
dc.contributor.authorKrause, Tyra
dc.contributor.authorNicolay, Nathalie
dc.contributor.authorNohynek, Hanna
dc.contributor.authorPavlopoulou, Ioanna
dc.contributor.authorPebody, Richard
dc.contributor.authorPenttinen, Pasi
dc.contributor.authorSoler‐Soneira, Marta
dc.contributor.authorWichmann, Ole
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, Patricia
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-29T12:35:26Z
dc.date.available2022-07-29T12:35:26Z
dc.date.created2022-04-25T15:39:08Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1052-9276
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3009190
dc.description.abstractThis review sought to assess the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of high-dose inactivated influenza vaccines (HD-IIV) for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza in individuals aged 18 years or older. A systematic literature search was conducted in electronic databases and grey literature sources up to 7 February 2020. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies of interventions (NRSIs) were included. The search returned 28,846 records, of which 36 studies were included. HD-IIV was shown to have higher relative vaccine efficacy in preventing influenza compared with standard-dose influenza vaccines (SD-IIV3) in older adults (Vaccine effectiveness (VE) = 24%, 95% CI 10–37, one RCT). One NRSI demonstrated significant effect for HD-IIV3 against influenza B (VE = 89%, 95% CI 47–100), but not for influenza A(H3N2) (VE = 22%, 95% CI −82 to 66) when compared with no vaccination in older adults. HD-IIV3 showed significant relative effect compared with SD-IIV3 for influenza-related hospitalisation (VE = 11.8%, 95% CI 6.4–17.0, two NRSIs), influenza- or pneumonia-related hospitalisation (VE = 13.7%, 95% CI 9.5–17.7, three NRSIs), influenza-related hospital encounters (VE = 13.1%, 95% CI 8.4–17.7, five NRSIs), and influenza-related office visits (VE = 3.5%, 95% CI 1.5–5.5, two NRSIs). For safety, HD-IIV were associated with significantly higher rates of local and systemic adverse events compared with SD-IIV (combined local reactions, pain at injection site, swelling, induration, headache, chills and malaise). From limited data, compared with SD-IIV, HD-IIV were found to be more effective in the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza, for a range of proxy outcome measures, and associated with more adverse events.
dc.description.abstractSystematic review of the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of high-dose seasonal influenza vaccines for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza in individuals ≥18 years of age
dc.language.isoeng
dc.titleSystematic review of the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of high-dose seasonal influenza vaccines for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza in individuals ≥18 years of age
dc.title.alternativeSystematic review of the efficacy, effectiveness and safety of high-dose seasonal influenza vaccines for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed influenza in individuals ≥18 years of age
dc.typePeer reviewed
dc.typeJournal article
dc.description.versionpublishedVersion
dc.source.journalReviews in Medical Virology
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/rmv.2330
dc.identifier.cristin2018992
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel